www.areyoulogical.com

A scientist is challenged with the requirement to be unbiased. Yet most of them are biased: project objectives that weren't first "trimmed" to the bare essentials using a process I call "context-normalization", words that include inadvertent assumption, words that over generalize, and words that generalize in the wrong way. And the big one: incorrectly applying the research of other scientists.

However, their bias is not all subconscious. Some of these scientists have word skills that are on par with "uncanny", and some of these scientists have given into the temptation to abuse these skills purposely.

Some of these scientists GLADLY sign off on statements that should NOT be signed off on. Using their word skills and credentials to unjustly gain grant money, and to move to the top of their respective fields. And worse yet, they use these word skills, manipulating subconscious bias in others, even other scientists, to move mainstream opinion in the wrong direction. The scientists that get to this point are truly powerful people doing a great misdeed for mankind.

For example: they receive a tip, or a hunch, that a scientific argument for the safety of a substance or product will result in grant money. So they use their extremely high word skills and credentials, writing articles that expound on the total safety of the substance or product through arguments that are not fully logical, yet sound beyond any reasonable doubt to be true, while skillfully evading arguments to the contrary, and wording everything in a way that once the truth is discovered later, it will look like an innocent mistake, a reasonable oversight given the then current information. I have read articles that are so convincing that they had me convinced, until I would reread and look objectively for how they dealt with existing and available arguments to the contrary - just to find that they did not even address them. Skillful words + professional appearance + high credentials = direct programing of subconscious bias. This results in seriously dangerous mainstream misinformation.

Entire industries are manipulated through the dynamic interactions of mainstream misinformation, legal substantiation, and liability.

Any situation involving liability forces an expert (not necessarily a doctor) to act on the mainstream information (including misinformation), so that legally substantiated "scientific fact" (or misinformation inappropriately deemed as such) will keep them out of hot water in their liability-intense profession (mainly medical professions, however, any profession where liability is a strong issue).

In other words, the actions of experts within liability intense professions, are manipulated by mainstream misinformation, potentially hurting or killing people for profit, without knowledge of this (because it appears to be some other more innocent cause), and while making it all deniable.

Subconscious bias is EASILY manipulated by word experts. Master manipulators posing as scientists, people involved in law enforcement or court who participate in the use of railroading tactics, authors who use Psychological Mind Control, salesmen, con artists, preachers, politicians, Hollywood - you'll find a lot of word experts in these areas, and many of them are happy to abuse their skill for profit, and/or for other reasons.

And generally, if one gets into trouble, he/she can get right back out of trouble by using his/her word skills. While the rest of us walk on egg shells around all the rules, these people navigate them like a pro hockey player navigates the ice.

The masses do not see it because of their emotional involvement with bias. This protects the bias, and blinds them to reason. Emotional involvement is the key that locks the bias in place. Emotional involvement can come from pride, love, hate, or just about any other emotion that potentially triggers what I call "the subconscious fixation switch".

• A lover will believe every good thing about the person he/she is with, transfiguring all clues subconsciously to paint good pictures about that person. Reality may hit a few months later as the same clues reform to paint less-than-perfect pictures of that person.
• Negative over generalizations about a specific race or group of people, once taken personally will effectively lock in a racial hatred in that person, who is then practically incapable of questioning the original generalizations due to the then very personal bias.
• Even the smart juror, using a mind capable of logic, could vote for a specific verdict based on their logical analysis of the "facts", where in actuality those "facts" were all that remained after their subconscious bias forced them to disregard everything that did not fit the context that was put there by railroading, and where many of those remaining "facts" were manufactured from railroading tactics in the first place.
• An inventor can discover something that sends his self esteem through the roof, then is unable to question it to the point necessary in taking it to the next level due to his emotional involvement from pride fixated on the way he words his initial discovery to his friends and colleagues.
• And a master manipulator, living his life as if he were a real scientist, uses his extremely high word skills and credentials to make sensible sounding arguments that get people to disregard the real science. He abuses his position and his extremely high word skills to get others to switch on their "fixation switch" on the issue, using arguments that appear and feel logical, within authoritative and professional presentation, blinding nearly everyone to the real science that is likely also readily available. He does this to help out an industry or entity that can favorably repay this fake scientist through grant money, a better position, and/or donation, resulting from either an invisible negotiation based on his hunch, or a tangible negotiation. And due to the master manipulator's exceptional word skills and mainstream credentials he conjurs collaboration through subconscious manipulation rather than through real science. And that is when a scientific falsehood is then railroaded through legal substantiation as if it were "fact".
• And even more powerful master manipulators planned what they wanted the fake scientist master manipulators to lie about, to fulfill even larger plans that they have for the resulting mainstream misinformation. They then indirectly push buttons that result in the circumstances that motivate the fake scientists to write the necessary articles that fulfill their bigger picture plans.